News Flash
  • Weekly newsletter from Chairman, CBEC dated 15/06/2018. Click here
  • Updated version of GST Concept and Status and PPT on GST - An Update as on 01/06/2018 have been uploaded.
  • Circulars clarifying miscellaneous issues related to SEZ and refund of unutilized ITC for job workers
  • Two Days' Training Programme on Free Trade Agreements for Group 'A' officers of CBIC on 28th & 29th June, 2018 at NACIN, Faridabad.Click here
  • CGST Rules, 2017 as amended upto 13.06.2018 have been uploaded
  • Notifications issued for amending the CGST Rules, 2017, and for specifying the list of goods which may be disposed off by the proper officer post seizure.
  • Renaming of Directorate General of Safeguards as Directorate General of Anti-profiteering.
  • Draft RRs for the post of Supdt CEx in Directorates under CBIC - comments from stakeholders.Click here
  • The MPR for GST-Refund (DDM-GST-1A) has been hosted on DDM website. GST Commissionerates are required to upload the GST Refund data from July, 2017 to May, 2018 at the earliest.
  • Field formations are informed that from this month onwards, DPM-CUS-13 and DPM-CUS-13A are included in the Part-V (Adjudication, Call Book, Refunds, Provisional Assessments, Miscellaneous) which is to be uploaded from April, 18 onwards.
  • Three Days’ Training on ‘DIGITAL FORENSICS’ for Group-‘A’ Officers of CBIC From 02nd July to 04th July, 2018 at Gujarat Forensic Sciences University, GandhinagarClick here
  • Seniority list of Assistant Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise. For Details… Click here
  • Comments are invited for Draft Provisional Assessment regulations, 2018 on uscus4.dor@gov.in up to 15.6.18.Click here
  • FAQs on Financial Services Sector published.Click here
  • Details of Prospective Trainings By NACIN and its ZTIs & RTIs in June, 2018 .Click here
  • Notification issued for extending the due date of filing of FORM GSTR-6 for the months from July, 2017 to June, 2018.Click here
  • Clarification regarding service tax on ambulance services provided to government by private service providers.Click here
  • Clarification on refund related issues. Click here
  • Dear Taxpayer, web-help service is available now and you can get faster resolution of your query by clicking the "SELF SERVICE" option under "HELP" tab in the top right of CBIC website cbec-gst.gov.in
  • Departmental Examination for promotion of Ministerial Officers to be held from 08.08.2018 to 10.08.2018
  • Weekly newsletter from Chairman, CBEC dated 25/05/2018. Click here
  • Introduction of monetary limit at the level of Commissioner (appeals) Click here
  • Nominatioans are invited from the formations of Bengaluru Zone for the ‘Course on Drugs and Related Laws’ scheduled on 29.05.2018 and 30.05.2018 Click here
  • CBLR Written Wxamination Result held on 19.01.2018 Click here
  • Instruction regarding Suo Motu Trasfer of authorisations on behalf of Union of India by the Authorised Commissioners. Click here
  • DDM-GST-5 MPR (showing Revenue Augmentation) has been Operationalized on DDM website today. GST Commissionerates are required to start uploading the requisite data from the month of July,2017 upto April,2018 at the earliest.
  • Member (A)'s instructions regarding revision of pre-2016 Pensioners as per 7th CPC. Click here
  • One Day Workshop On " E-Way Bill Systems" for the Group 'A' Officers of CBIC on 08th June, 2018 Click here
  • Notification issued for extending the due date of filing of FORM GSTR-3B for the month of April, 2018. Click here
  • Diversion of the posts of Principal Chief Commissioners of CBEC on their promotion. Click here
  • Draft Integrated All India Seniority List of Administrative Officers of Customs for the period 01.07.2014 to 31.12.2016 Click here
  • Positive Change through Emotional Intelligence and Personality Development Click here
  • Grievance Redressal Officers (CBIC and State / UT Governments) for e-way bill system under rule 138D of Central/ State GST Rules, 2017 Click here
  • Circular on applicability of POPS to development of software and services on software issued - Click here
  • Change of Date Of "Two Days' Training Programme On Free Trade Agreement, Possible Misuse & Redressal Mechanism" from 14th & 15th May to 28th & 29th June, 2018 Click here
  • Annual General Transfer 2018 Circular Click here
  • Wider participation of citizens/public/employees is requested in taking online Integrity Pledge. For taking online Integrity Pledge please click here
  • Advisory on AIO functioning, connectivity issues for GST.-click here, TCS Escalatoin Matrix for GST Zones LAN Implementation, Wipro Handholders, HP Resident Engineers
View all

AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS
(CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX)
NEW DELHI

PRESENT

 

Hon'ble Mr.Justice Syed Shah
Mohammad Quadri (Chairman)
Mr. Somnath Pal (Member) Dr. B.A. Agrawal (Member)

 

Order No.AAR/CE/05/2004
Application No.AAR/104/CE/2004
 

 

Applicant M/s.Crystal Interior Products
Plot No.41, GIDC, Ichhapore
Sachin-Hazira Road,
Bhatpore Village,
Surat-394510
Commissioner concerned  Commissioner, Central Excise,
Surat-I
Present :  for the applicant for the Commissioner     concerned   Shri J.D.Shah, Advocate
 

Shri A.K. Roy, Joint CDR
CESTAT, New Delhi .

Shri Sanjay Singh, Supdt.
Central Excise Commissionerate
Surat-I

O R D E R
(Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Shah Mohammad Quadri)

 

   This is an application under section 23C of the Central Excise Act, 1944, (for short the "Act" ), seeking advance ruling of the Authority on the following question :-
Whether the products in question are classifiable under Chapter Heading 7323.90 or 7326.19 or any other Chapter Head or more than one Chapter Head.
2 . The applicant is a resident Indian partnership firm which is a S.S.I unit.  It claims to be in the process of setting up a joint venture.  It is engaged in the manufacture and sale of the iron and steel wire products.  It says that the products in question are classified by the excise department under Chapter heading 7326.19 and states that by its letter dated 7.4.2004, it has accepted the classification provisionally subject to final ruling by the Advance Rulings Authority, which the department has also accepted.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant and the Commissioner.
4. After examining the application and the comments of the Commissioner, the Authority issued a  notice to the applicant on 4th June 2004 requiring the applicant to explain as to why the application should not be rejected on any one or more of the following grounds :-
  (i)  the details and documentary evidence in respect of the non-resident co-venturer in the proposed joint venture have not been provided in the application;
  (ii) the question raised in the application appears to fall under clause (a) of the first proviso to sub-section (2) of section 23D of the Act;
  (iii)  the applicant appears to have already commenced the activity of manufacture of goods which are the subject matter of the advance ruling application.
5. In so far as the first ground is concerned, the applicant has complied with the requirement of the notice.  Regarding grounds (ii) and (iii), the application is listed today for hearing the applicant and the Commissioner.
6. To appreciate the point involved in the second ground, it would be useful to refer to sub-section (2) of section 23D which is in the following terms:
  " (2) The Authority may, after examining the application and the records called for, by order, either allow or reject the application: Provided that the Authority shall not allow the application where the question raised in the application is, -
  (a) already pending in the applicant's case before any Central Excise Officer, the Appellate Tribunal or any Court;
  (b) the same as in a matter already decided by the Appellate Tribunal or any Court: Provided further that no application shall be rejected under this sub-section unless an opportunity has been given to the applicant of being heard: Provided also that where the application is rejected, reasons for such rejection shall be given in the order".
7. A perusal of the provisions, extracted above, would show that under clause (a) of the first proviso to sub-section (2) of section 23D, the Authority cannot allow the application (cannot entertain for pronouncing advance ruling under sub-section (4) thereof), if the question raised in the application is already pending in the applicant's case before any Central Excise Officer or Appellate Tribunal or any Court.  The letter of  the Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise, Division -IV, Surat-I dated 26th April 2004, addressed to the applicant implies that the question of classification is pending before the Division-IV, Surat-I.  The applicant, it appears, has approached the Commissioner for classification of the goods and addressed letters dated 29/11/2003 and 7/4/2004 .  It was in response to those letters that the aforementioned letter of the Assistant Commissioner was issued.  A reading of that letter as well as the letter of 25th May 2004 leaves no doubt in our mind that the question of classification is pending before the Central Excise Authority and a situation postulated in clause (a) of the first proviso to sub-section (2) of section 23D exists.   On this ground alone, the application is liable to be rejected.
8. However, as we have referred to ground (iii) in our notice, we would take up that point as well.  This relates to commencement of activity of manufacture of goods.  A reference to the definition of "advance ruling", in this connection, would be pertinent. Clause (b) of section 23A of the Act defines "advance ruling" thus:
    "advance ruling" means the determination, by the authority of a question of law or fact specified in the application regarding the liability to pay duty in relation to an activity proposed to be undertaken, by the applicant."
9. A plain reading of the definition makes it clear that "advance ruling" means the determination, by the Authority, of a question of law or fact specified in the application regarding liability to pay duty in relation to an activity proposed to be undertaken by the applicant.  The question that arises here is whether the applicant is at the stage of proposing to undertake the activity or has already commenced the activity of manufacture of goods.
     
10 In response to the letter issued by the Secretariat of the Authority on 14th May 2004, seeking clarification in that regard, the applicant replied by its letter dated 22nd May 2004. Para '4' of that letter is relevant here and reads thus -
    " 4.       The point regarding the manufacture of the excisable items for which advance ruling is applied, please refer to the statements of fact given with application in which we have stated that yes we do manufacture the said goods at present."(emphasis supplied)
10. It is categorically admitted in the para, referred to above, that the applicant has already started manufacturing the goods in question. In view of this factual position, the activity cannot be said to be an activity proposed to be undertaken.  Therefore, in respect of the aforementioned goods, no question seeking advance ruling can be entertained by the Authority.
11. For the aforementioned reasons, we reject the application.

 

Sd/-
(Somnath Pal)
Member
Sd/-
(Justice S.S.M.Quadri)
Chairman
 Sd/-
(B.A.Agrawal)
Member  

Dated 12th October, 2004.

F.No.AAR/44/104/04