News Flash
  • "Updated version of GST Concept and Status and PPT on GST - An Update"
  • Weekly newsletter from Chairman, CBEC dated 23/02/2018 Click here
  • Annual Calendar of Departmental Examination for the year 2018-19 Click here
  • 28th India - Sri Lanka DG Level Talks on Anti-Smuggling and related matters being held on 22-23 February, 2018 in New Delhi between DG, DRI and DG, Customs, Sri Lanka.
  • “All users are informed that, the new version of MSR for Part-I has been uploaded”
  • One day Training on Government e-Market Place (GeM) and Competition Law for Group 'A' officers of CBEC on 20th February, 2018 click here
  • Circular on Proper officer under sections 73 and 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 has been uploaded
  • Video on implementation of Swachhta Action Plan by CBEC Click here
  • Notification for postponing the implementation of e-way bill rules has been issued
  • Letter to All CCAs regarding Taking Care while send Direct Recruitment Quota Requisition to DGHRD Click here
  • Government e-Market Place (GeM) and Competition Law for Group 'A' officers of CBEC on 20th February, 2018 click here
  • Training Schedule of GeM & e-Procurement Click Here
  • FAQs on EWay Bill Provisions in GSTclick here
  • CBEC launches IT tools ICETRAK and ICETAB for trade facilitation and faster clearances – To download ICETRAK, click here here on your Android mobile phone
  • Complete utilization of funds under "O.E." & "RRT" Object Heads in FY 2017-18click here
  • Letter to all CCs/DGs informing DGHRD Swachhta Whatapp Numberclick here
  • Reports on user Experienceclick here
  • Removing "Retired, but PPO not issued" figures reflecting on "Bhavishya" portal screenclick here
  • Advisory on AIO functioning, connectivity issues for GST.-click here, TCS Escalatoin Matrix for GST Zones LAN Implementation, Wipro Handholders, HP Resident Engineers
View all

AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS

(CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS & SERVICE TAX)

NEW DELHI

 

PRESENT

 

Hon'ble Mr.Justice Syed Shah Mohammad Quadri (Chairman)

Order No.AAR/07(ST)/2006

 in

Application No.AAR/44/13(ST)/2006

 

 

Applicant                                                                       M/s Orissa Chrome Export and

                                                                                    Mining Company Limited

                                                                                    A-65/1, Nayapalli

                                                                                    Bhubaneswar-751012

                                                                                    Orissa

                                                                                                                                               

 

Commissioner concerned                                               Commissioner of Central Excise

                                                                                    Bhubaneswar

                                                                                   

 

Present for the Applicant                                                Mr. Biswajit Das, Advocate

                                                                                               

                                                                                   

Present for the Commissioner                                         Mr. A.K. Roy, Joint CDR

concerned                                                                     CESTAT, New Delhi

 

 

O R D E R

 

(Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Shah Mohammad Quadri)

 

                       

The applicant M/s Orissa Chrome Export and Mining Company Limited, Bhubaneswar, Orissa filed this application under 96C (1) of the Finance Act, 1994 (for short "Service Tax Act")  seeking an advance ruling of the Authority on the following questions.

"1. Whether the service tax liability can be imposed upon the service availer like us who is engaged in the manufacturing and Exporting and  is availing Services  like transportation of goods through roads from the transport service provider during the course of our trade and commerce of export.

 

2. As we are exclusively involved in the 100% export, whether we are end for exemption / Waiver / tax holiday from the service Tax.

 

3. Is it correct to hold that we are end for the benefits of the provisions of rule 3(1) (iii) of export of Service rules, 2005 as transportation services are provided  to us in relation to our business or commerce and the ultimate recipient of those services are located outside India?

 

4. Is it correct to hold that all the activity, incidental and ancillary, facilitating the export shall also fall within the ambit of export and  enjoy the same benefits as are available to the Export?"

 

2.         The applicant is carrying on the activity of manufacture and export.  In the application against column No . 6, it is stated that the applicant is an existing exporter.  The jurisdictional Commissioner forwarded the comments to the application pointing, inter alia, that the applicant has been issued a show cause notice with reference to the demand of service tax and the matter is pending before Assistant Commissioner/Deputy Commissioner, (Service Tax Adjudication), Bhubaneswar.  In view of the position stated above the Authority issued a notice to the applicant on 28.11.2006 to show case why the application should not be rejected for the ground mentioned therein. The relevant portion of the notice reads thus :-

"2.    The Authority is tentatively of the view that the said application is liable to be rejected on the following two grounds:

(i)       The question on which the applicant has sought an advance ruling relates to an "on going" activity / service as has been admitted in applicant's letter dated 03.10.2006.

 

(ii)     It has been brought to the notice of the Authority by the concerned Commissioner, Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax, Bhubaneswar-I Commissionerate, Bhubaneswar   that the issue raised in Question No. 1 of the application is already pending before the Assistant Commissioner / Deputy Commissioner (Service Tax Adjudication), Bhubaneswar.  A copy of the Commissioner's comments alongwith enclosures thereto including Show Cause Notice No. IV(14)20/S.TAX/BBSR-I/2006/9591A  dated 17.05.2002 is enclosed herewith.    

 3.     However, before a final decision is taken by the Authority, you are hereby required to show cause as to why the application should not be rejected on the aforementioned grounds. Written submissions, if any, may be filed  positively within two weeks from the date of the receipt of this notice."

3.         The applicant filed its reply stating in para 4 of the reply that the objects and reasons of advance ruling with respect to a particular provision of the Act and since the relevant provision of the Act have come very recently, the applicant which was in the business has expeditiously approached the Authority to obtain an advance ruling on the subject.  Even now it is in the ongoing activity.   It is stated that the matter which is pending before the Commissioner, Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax, Bhubaneswar with respect to an assessment and not with respect to substantial question of law and that the subject matter before the Authority is in relation to a substantial question of law. That the matter before the Authority is different from the matter pending before the Commissioner, Central Excise Bhubaneswar. 

 

4.         Mr. Biswajit Das, Learned Counsel appearing for the applicant submits that  no doubt the activity which is being carried on in respect of which advance is sought, is on going activity but the moment this activity was brought within the ambit of the Service Tax Act,  the applicant has immediately approached the Authority.  Therefore, it cannot be treated as an on going activity for the purposes of the Act.  In reply to a question from the Authority the Learned Counsel submits that after coming into force of the Act this activity was not stopped and still it continues. 

 

5.         To appreciate the contention of the Learned Counsel it is necessary to notice the provision of the Section 96 A(a) which is in the following terms :

 

Section 96A.  Definitions - In this Chapter, unless the context otherwise requires, -

 

(a)   "advance ruling" means the determination, by the Authority, of a question of law or fact specified in the application regarding the liability to pay service tax in relation to a service proposed to be provided, by the applicant;

 

6.         The definition of advance ruling, referred to above, makes it abundantly clear that it is concerned with determine the question of law or fact in relation to service which is proposed to be provided by the applicant.  In as much as in this case the activity in respect of advance ruling is sought, is not the one  which is proposed to be provided but is an ongoing activity, the application is not maintainable.  We have taken the same view in case of M/s McDonald's India Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai - Order No. AAR/44/103/2003 dated 23.02.2004), M/s Om Construction, Jabalpur - Order No. AAR/01(ST)/2005 dated 06.01.2005 and M/s IJM (India) Infrastructure Limited, New Delhi - Order No. AAR/05(ST)/2006 dated 9.11.2006.  

 

7.         In the view I have taken above, it is not necessary to go into the second ground of rejection for the above reasons.

 

8.         The application is rejected.                                                                     

 (Justice S.S.M.Quadri)

Chairman

Dated : 14th December, 2006