News Flash
  • General Elections to the Legislative Assemblies of Haryana and Maharashtra etc. Click Here
  • e-Version (1.0) of Sampark-2019 as updated on 01.09.2019 has been mailed to all Zones and Directorates.
  • Reorganisation proposal of Directorates-reg. Click Here
  • One-Day Training on "Right to Information Act, 2005" for CBIC officers on 27th September, 2019 at NACIN, Faridabad. Click Here
  • Tender For Supplying Of A Fountain With Installation & Commissioning.. Click Here
  • Corringendum dated 06.09.2019 for waiver from mentioning UIN on invoices extended upto 31st March 2020
  • Adjudication of Show Cause Notices issued by DRI, DGCEI, SIIB, Preventive etc in light of the judgment in the case of M/s Mangali Impex. Click Here
  • Prospective Training Report to be conducted by NACIN and its Zonal Campuses for the month of September, 2019 Click Here
  • The Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019,(SVLDRS) application has been made available online at https://cbic-gst.gov.in from 1-9-19. The declaration under Section 125 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019 can now be made electronically in Form SVLDRS-1 by the declarant
  • Revision of the existing guidelines for grant of financial assistance for setting up/ refurbishing of Departmental Canteen/ Kitchenette - reg. Click Here
  • Request for Proposal for running Service Centers at various Customs EDI locations is available on http://eprocure.gov.in/eprocure/app Last date for submitting the bids is 18th October 2019. Click Here
  • One-Day Training on "Right to Information Act, 2005" for Group 'A' officers of CBIC on 27th September, 2019 at NACIN, Faridabad Click Here
  • Residential Course on "Financial Intelligence and Investigations" for Officers of CBIC at IIM,Bengaluru from 16th to 27th September, 2019Click Here
  • DG's letter on the identification and execution of the Swachhta Projects for the financial year 2019-20.Click Here
  • To decide eligibility of candidates appearing for Departmental Exams to be conducted by NACIN in 2019-2020, CCAs may refer Recruitment Rules and Annual Examination Calendar 2019-2020. This clarification can be viewed through this linkClick Here
View all

AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS

(CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS & SERVICE TAX)

NEW DELHI

 

PRESENT

 

Hon'ble Mr.Justice Syed Shah Mohammad Quadri (Chairman)

Order No.AAR/07(ST)/2006

 in

Application No.AAR/44/13(ST)/2006

 

 

Applicant                                                                       M/s Orissa Chrome Export and

                                                                                    Mining Company Limited

                                                                                    A-65/1, Nayapalli

                                                                                    Bhubaneswar-751012

                                                                                    Orissa

                                                                                                                                               

 

Commissioner concerned                                               Commissioner of Central Excise

                                                                                    Bhubaneswar

                                                                                   

 

Present for the Applicant                                                Mr. Biswajit Das, Advocate

                                                                                               

                                                                                   

Present for the Commissioner                                         Mr. A.K. Roy, Joint CDR

concerned                                                                     CESTAT, New Delhi

 

 

O R D E R

 

(Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Shah Mohammad Quadri)

 

                       

The applicant M/s Orissa Chrome Export and Mining Company Limited, Bhubaneswar, Orissa filed this application under 96C (1) of the Finance Act, 1994 (for short "Service Tax Act")  seeking an advance ruling of the Authority on the following questions.

"1. Whether the service tax liability can be imposed upon the service availer like us who is engaged in the manufacturing and Exporting and  is availing Services  like transportation of goods through roads from the transport service provider during the course of our trade and commerce of export.

 

2. As we are exclusively involved in the 100% export, whether we are end for exemption / Waiver / tax holiday from the service Tax.

 

3. Is it correct to hold that we are end for the benefits of the provisions of rule 3(1) (iii) of export of Service rules, 2005 as transportation services are provided  to us in relation to our business or commerce and the ultimate recipient of those services are located outside India?

 

4. Is it correct to hold that all the activity, incidental and ancillary, facilitating the export shall also fall within the ambit of export and  enjoy the same benefits as are available to the Export?"

 

2.         The applicant is carrying on the activity of manufacture and export.  In the application against column No . 6, it is stated that the applicant is an existing exporter.  The jurisdictional Commissioner forwarded the comments to the application pointing, inter alia, that the applicant has been issued a show cause notice with reference to the demand of service tax and the matter is pending before Assistant Commissioner/Deputy Commissioner, (Service Tax Adjudication), Bhubaneswar.  In view of the position stated above the Authority issued a notice to the applicant on 28.11.2006 to show case why the application should not be rejected for the ground mentioned therein. The relevant portion of the notice reads thus :-

"2.    The Authority is tentatively of the view that the said application is liable to be rejected on the following two grounds:

(i)       The question on which the applicant has sought an advance ruling relates to an "on going" activity / service as has been admitted in applicant's letter dated 03.10.2006.

 

(ii)     It has been brought to the notice of the Authority by the concerned Commissioner, Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax, Bhubaneswar-I Commissionerate, Bhubaneswar   that the issue raised in Question No. 1 of the application is already pending before the Assistant Commissioner / Deputy Commissioner (Service Tax Adjudication), Bhubaneswar.  A copy of the Commissioner's comments alongwith enclosures thereto including Show Cause Notice No. IV(14)20/S.TAX/BBSR-I/2006/9591A  dated 17.05.2002 is enclosed herewith.    

 3.     However, before a final decision is taken by the Authority, you are hereby required to show cause as to why the application should not be rejected on the aforementioned grounds. Written submissions, if any, may be filed  positively within two weeks from the date of the receipt of this notice."

3.         The applicant filed its reply stating in para 4 of the reply that the objects and reasons of advance ruling with respect to a particular provision of the Act and since the relevant provision of the Act have come very recently, the applicant which was in the business has expeditiously approached the Authority to obtain an advance ruling on the subject.  Even now it is in the ongoing activity.   It is stated that the matter which is pending before the Commissioner, Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax, Bhubaneswar with respect to an assessment and not with respect to substantial question of law and that the subject matter before the Authority is in relation to a substantial question of law. That the matter before the Authority is different from the matter pending before the Commissioner, Central Excise Bhubaneswar. 

 

4.         Mr. Biswajit Das, Learned Counsel appearing for the applicant submits that  no doubt the activity which is being carried on in respect of which advance is sought, is on going activity but the moment this activity was brought within the ambit of the Service Tax Act,  the applicant has immediately approached the Authority.  Therefore, it cannot be treated as an on going activity for the purposes of the Act.  In reply to a question from the Authority the Learned Counsel submits that after coming into force of the Act this activity was not stopped and still it continues. 

 

5.         To appreciate the contention of the Learned Counsel it is necessary to notice the provision of the Section 96 A(a) which is in the following terms :

 

Section 96A.  Definitions - In this Chapter, unless the context otherwise requires, -

 

(a)   "advance ruling" means the determination, by the Authority, of a question of law or fact specified in the application regarding the liability to pay service tax in relation to a service proposed to be provided, by the applicant;

 

6.         The definition of advance ruling, referred to above, makes it abundantly clear that it is concerned with determine the question of law or fact in relation to service which is proposed to be provided by the applicant.  In as much as in this case the activity in respect of advance ruling is sought, is not the one  which is proposed to be provided but is an ongoing activity, the application is not maintainable.  We have taken the same view in case of M/s McDonald's India Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai - Order No. AAR/44/103/2003 dated 23.02.2004), M/s Om Construction, Jabalpur - Order No. AAR/01(ST)/2005 dated 06.01.2005 and M/s IJM (India) Infrastructure Limited, New Delhi - Order No. AAR/05(ST)/2006 dated 9.11.2006.  

 

7.         In the view I have taken above, it is not necessary to go into the second ground of rejection for the above reasons.

 

8.         The application is rejected.                                                                     

 (Justice S.S.M.Quadri)

Chairman

Dated : 14th December, 2006