News Flash
  • Notifications specifying the tax collection at source (TCS) rates to be collected by e-commerce operators for inter-State and intra-State supplies issued.
  • Nomination For One-Day Training on Right To Information Act, 2005 For Group 'A' Officers Of CBIC on 08th October, 2018 at NACIN, FaridabadClick here
  • Call for nomination for Advance Licensing and Enforcement Exchange Training Program to be conducted at Foreign Services Institute, New Delhi from 29 October-02 November, 2018 Click here
  • Member Admin DO regarding Swachhata Hi Sewa (SHS) 2018 from 15.09.2018 to 02.10.2018Click here   |  Enclosures
  • Examination for confirmation of enrollment of GST practitionersEnglish   |   Hindi
  • Extension of time limit for submitting the declaration in FORM GST TRAN-1 under rule 117(1A) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 in certain casesClick here
  • Guidelines for Deductions and Deposits of TDS by the DDO under GSTClick here
  • Filing single application in High Courts and Cestat in order to complete withdrawal of identified cases by 30.09.18Click here
  • Circular No.64/38/2018-GST, dated 14.09.2018 modifying Circular Nos. 41 and 49 of 2018 issuedClick here
  • Swachhta Hi Sewa(SHS)2018" from 15.09.2018 to 2.10.2018-reg.Click here
  • Clarification regarding processing of refund claims filed by UIN entitlesClick here
  • CGST Rules, 2017 as amended upto 13.09.2018 have been uploaded
  • Notifications issued to bring provisions related to TDS and TCS into force w.e.f 01st October, 2018; and to amend CGST Rules, 2017
  • Clarification regarding reporting of DR quota vacancies in CBIC for the year 2018.Click here
  • CGST Rules, 2017 as amended upto 10.09.2018 have been uploaded.
  • Notifications issued for extending the due dates for filing of FORM GSTR - 1 for all taxpayers and FORM GSTR-3B for specified classes of taxpayers; and for making amendments to the CGST Rules, 2018.Click here
  • Swachhta Uday Booklet is available now.Click here
  • The GST Templates for Part-III (Anti-evasion) and Part-V (Adjudication, Call Book, Refunds, Provisional Assessments, Miscellaneous) of MPRs have been hosted on the DDM website. GST Commissionerates are required to upload data in the said MPRs from July, 2017 onwards at the earliest.
  • Notifications issued for extending the due dates for filing of FORM GST ITC-04 andFORM GST ITC-01 for specified classes of taxpayers; waiving of late fees for specified classes of taxpayers; and for making amendments to the CGST Rules, 2018
  • Updated version of GST Concept and Status and PPT on GST - An Update as on 01/09/2018 have been uploaded
  • Supply and Installation of One Ultra Short Throw Projector in NACIN, CochinClick here
  • e-Tender notice for Vehicle Tender for NACIN, ChennaiClick here
  • Chairman newsletter dated 14.09.2018
  • Details of Prospective Trainings by NACIN and its ZTIs & RTIs in September, 2018 .Click here
  • Furnishing of compliance report in respect of AGT 2018 in the grade DC/AC.Click here
  • OM dated 28.08.2018 regarding AISL of Administrative Officers (Cx & Dte.) for the period 01.01.2009 to 30.06.2014Click here
  • The Templates (MPRs) for Withdrawal of Departmental Appeals (DJC-GST-A, DJC-GST-B, DJC-GST-C, DJC-GST-X and DJC-GST-M) has been hosted on DDM website. Central Excise & GST Commissionerates as well as Customs Commissionerates are required to upload the Withdrawal of Departmental Appeals data.
  • Notifications issued to extend the due dates for filing of FORM GSTR-3B and FORM GSTR-1 for registered persons in Kerala and persons having principal place of business in Kodagu or Mahe
  • Inviting Nominations for 1 day Training Workshop on " Welfare measures and incentives provided for SC/ST Officers" on 31st August 2018 at Centre of Excellence, New Delhi Click here
View all

AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS
(CUSTOMS & CENTRAL EXCISE)

PRESENT

Hon'ble Justice Syed Mohammed
Quadri
(Chairman)
Dr. K.N. Chaturvedi (Member) Mr. Somnath Pal (Member)

 

ORDER NO. AAR(ST)R02-04/2004 dated 23-02-2004
APPLICATION No. AAR/44/103/2003

Name & address of the Applicant M/s. McDonald's India Pvt. Ltd.
Ashiana, 69C
Bhulabhai Desai Road,
Mumbai- 400 026.
Present for the Applicant Mr. V. Sridharan,
Advocate
Commissioner concerned Commissioner, Central Excise
Mumbai-I.
Present for the Department Mr. L. Rajendran
Assistant Commissioner
Service-tax, Central Excise
Mumbai-I.

O R D E R
(By  Mr. Justice Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri)

            In this application under Section 96C of the Finance Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the Finance Act), the applicant seeks an advance ruling from this Authority on the question:

            "Applicability of service tax on agreements executed for franchise services prior to the date of introduction of service tax i.e. 1st July, 2003."

          Having regard to the provisions of sub-Section 2 of Section 96D of the Finance Act, we have perused the application, the comments received from the Commissioner and having perused the technical note tentatively we are of the opinion that the application is liable to be rejected. A notice in terms of the second proviso to sub-Section 2 of Section 96D shall be issued to the applicant to explain as to why the application should not be rejected on the grounds:

 

(a) that the activity has already been commenced and therefore is not the one which is proposed to be undertaken.

(b) that the question now raised before the Authority is pending  consideration of the Central Excise Officer.

2. Mr. Sridharan, learned Counsel, appearing for the applicant takes notice and requests for waiver of issuing of written notice to the applicant. He proposes to argue the point in regard to the maintainability of the application.

3. We have heard the learned counsel and the learned Departmental representative.

4. To appreciate the question of maintainability of the application on the first ground, it will be useful to refer to certain provisions of the Finance Act. Section 96D which deals with the procedure on receipt of application, inter alia, provides:

          "(2) The Authority may, after examining the application and the records called for, by order, either allow or reject the application;

            Provided that the Authority shall not allow the application where the question raised in the application is, -

          (a) already pending in the applicant's case before any Central Excise    Officer, the Appellate Tribunal or any Court;  

          (b) the same as in a matter already decided by the Appellate Tribunal    or any Court;  

          Provided also that where the application is rejected, reasons for such   rejection shall be given in the order"

5.  A perusal of the main provision requires the Authority to examine the application as to whether it should be allowed in the sense of entertaining or admitting the application so as to pronounce an advance ruling under the provisions of the Act or whether it should be rejected. Here, it would be relevant to notice the meaning of the expressions " advance ruling" defined in clause (a) and "applicant" contained in clause (b) of Section 96A of the Finance Act. The said clauses are quoted below:

           (a) "advance ruling" means the determination by the Authority of a question of law or fact specified in the application regarding the liability to pay service tax in relation to a service proposed to be provided, by the applicant;

          (b) "applicant" means -

(i) a non-resident setting up a joint venture in India in  collaboration with a non-resident or a resident; or

(ii) a resident setting up a joint venture in India in collaboration  with a non-resident; or

(iii) a wholly owned subsidiary Indian Company, of which  the    holding company is a foreign company,  who proposes to undertake any business activity in India and makes    application for advance ruling"

6.   Now adverting to the expression "advance ruling", referred to above, it means the determination of a question of law or fact specified in the application regarding the liability to pay service tax in relation to a service proposed to be provided by the applicant. Of the afore-mentioned 3 sub- clauses of sub-Section (b) which defines the term "applicant", the applicant falls under sub-clause (iii) which refers to a wholly owned subsidiary Indian company, of which the holding company is a foreign company. A combined reading of the afore-mentioned provisions in the light of the scheme of the Act suggests that an applicant who is yet to commence his business activity can, if he so desires, avail the benefit of seeking advance ruling from the Authority on a question of law or fact regarding his liability to pay service tax in relation to a service proposed to be provided by him. Obviously, the benefit of seeking advance ruling from the Authority would not apply in the case of an ongoing business or undertaking which has already commenced the business.

7.      The contention of Mr. Sridharan, learned counsel of the applicant, is that inasmuch as the applicant is a wholly owned subsidiary Indian company which postulates existence of the company as well as carrying on the business by such a company, so it is end to seek advance ruling from the Authority, therefore, preliminary objection is not tenable. We are afraid, we cannot accept the contention of the learned counsel.  The reading of the said provision suggested by the learned counsel, would amount to ignoring the latter part of sub-clause (b) of Section 96A which says that the  applicant "who proposes to undertake any business activity in India and makes application for advance ruling". The words 'proposes to undertake'    read with sub-clause (iii) afore-mentioned unmistakeably indicates that the activity ought not have been begun as on the date of filing of the application.

8. In the instant case, the applicant, MIs. McDonald's India Private Ltd., entered into Franchise Agreement with Hardcastle Restarurants Private Ltd. and Amit Jatia, a citizen of India, and with Connaught  Plaza Restaurants Pvt. Ltd. and Vikram Bakshi, under which Franchise, the right, licence and privilege were granted for a period of 20 years from the date of opening of restaurant. The Franchise Agreements were executed on 24.11.1998 and on 7.02.2000 respectively for a period of 20 years from the date of opening of restaurant and the business had already commenced. While so, by notification No. 7/2003 application of service-tax was notified in respect of franchise services category from 1.7.2003. Admittedly, in this case, the petitioner's business was continuing when the provisions of the Act were brought in force in respect of franchise service category as on 1 July, 2003.

9. The application would, therefore, be not maintainable for the afore- mentioned reasons. The application is rejected on the first ground. In this view of the matter we do not consider it necessary to go into the question of validity of the second ground of rejection.

 

Sd/     
(Dr K.N. CHATURVEDI) 
MEMBER
 Sd/  
(SOMNATH PAL)
MEMBER
 Sd/
(JUSTICE S.S.M. QUADR1)
CHAIRMAN

NEW DELHI
DATED: 23.02.2004
 

F.N. AAR/44/103/2003