News Flash
  • Calling of nomination for Training on Drug Law Enforcement,identified in APR 2016-17,to be conducted at NACIN Faridabad on 18-19 July, 2019 -Click here
  • The Departmental exam for promotion of Tax Assistants (TA) to the grade of Executive Assistants (EA) in Customs and Central Tax Depts will be held from 16th to 18th September 2019 . The relevant circulars and Syllabus can be viewed through this link. -Click here
  • Notification to extend the date from which the facility of blocking and unblocking on e-way bill facility shall be brought into force till 21.08.2019 issued.
  • Result of examination for gst practitioners held on 14.06.2019 -Click here
  • MPLS service providers are requested to participate and showcase their MPLS network presence & clientele across India in the industry consultation scheduled on 25th June 2019, 3:00 PM at O/o Additional Directorate General (Systems), CBIC, 1st Floor Tower 1 & 2, NBCC Plaza, Saket, New Delhi – 110017
  • The Departmental exam for promotion of Ministerial staff to the grade of Inspectors of Central Taxes and Inspectors of Customs (EOs & POs) will be held from 7th to 9thAugust 2019. The relevant circulars and Syllabus can be viewed through this lin -Click here The dates and schedule for Departmental exam for promotion of Ministerial staff to the grade of Executive Assistants (EAs) will be announced later.
  • Prospective Training Report to be conducted by NACIN and its Zonal Campuses for the month of June -Click here
  • Successful launch today of "CBIC-Sanchar", a digital communication tool for fast and easy communication with the department on the DDM portal. www.cbecddm.gov.in Users are requested to use it actively and give feedback.
  • Training on Prevention of Wildlife Trafficking for Gr-A & Gr-B officers of CBIC at NACIN, Faridabad on 20th & 21st June, 2019 -Click here
  • RESULT OF CUSTOMS BROKER EXAMINATION, 2019 -Click here
  • Change of nomenclature of the post of Superintendent of Central excise working in the Directorate under CBIC as Additional Assistant Director - reg -Click here
  • Updated versions of GST - Concept and Status, and GST - An Update as on 01/06/2019 have been uploaded
  • OM dated 06.06.2019 regarding AISL of Administrative Officers (CGST & Central Excise including Directorates) for the period 01.01.2009 - 30.06.2014Click Here
  • Grant of Commendation Certificate on the occasion of GST Day,2019-regClick Here
  • Advertisement-cum-Schedule in relation to GST Practitioner's Examination, 2019 English ||   Hindi
  • Inviting articles and case studies for the inaugural issue of NACIN JournalClick Here
  • Guidelines for GST Practitioner Exam under Rule 83A(9) issued by NACIN, FaridabadClick Here
  • Draft notification to amend the Customs (Import of Goods at Concessional Rate of Duty) Rules, 2017 Click Here | Feedback and suggestions be sent to dircus@nic.in or anil.sapra@gov.in, within 30 days i.e by 26.06.2019.
  • ACES PORTAL (www.aces.gov.in) FUNCTIONALITIES ARE MIGRATED TO INTEGRATED CBIC-GST PORTAL.PLEASE VISIT www.cbic-gst.gov.in FOR CENTRAL EXCISE & SERVICE TAX ONLINE TRANSACTIONS.
  • SEPARATE ADVISORIES EXPLAINING STEP-BY-STEP PROCEDURE FOR EXISTING TAXPAYER MIGRATION AND NEW TAX PAYER REGISTRATION ISSUED BY DG SYSTEMS." CLICK "WHAT'S NEW" ON THE HOME PAGE OF www.aces.gov.in.
  • Letter issued for Next Dept. Exam. of Inspectors to be held from 06.08.2019 to 09.08.2019. Please download the same from.www.nacenkanpur.gov.in
  • Examination Notice for Promotion of LDCs to cadre of TAsClick Here
  • Chairman CBIC launched 'Samarth' an e-learning platform on 20.05.2019 developed by DG/System in collaboration with NACIN. For accessing 'Samarth' please visit NACIN website under LMS Tab.
  • Guidelines for GST Practitioner Exam under Rule 83A(9) issued by NACIN, faridabad. Click Here
  • Proposals are invited from eligible Bidders to be appointed as Program Governance and Monitoring Agency (PG&MA) for CBIC’s IT Initiatives. The RFP document can be purchased from the office of DG Systems and Data Management by Bidders who successfully qualified CBIC's EOI dated 28.02.2019 for this project.
  • Scheme for compassionate appointment - relative merit point & revised procedure for selection - regClick Here
  • FAQ on real estate consequent to recent changes in GST rate structure FAQ on Real estate sector    FAQ (Part II) on real estate sector
  • Press Release-cum-Schedule in relation to GST Practitioner's Examination, 2019 on CBIC. English    Hindi
  • Corrigendum to nomination calling letter for course on "Financial Intelligence & Investigations" at IIM, BengaluruClick Here
  • Course on Financial Intelligence and Investigations for officers of CBIC at IIM, Bengaluru from 15th to 26th July, 2019. Click Here Eng
  • Annual Calendar of Departmental Examination for the year 2019-20 Click Here
View all

AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS

(CENTRAL EXCISE, CUSTOMS AND SERVICE TAX)

NEW DELHI

 

 CORAM

 

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri (Chairman)

Mr. Somnath Pal (Member)

Dr. Brahm Avtar Agrawal (Member)

 

Order No. AAR/02(ST)/2006

in

Application No. AAR/03/ST/2006

 

 

Applicant Pfizer Limited,
Pfizer Centre, Patel Estate,
S.V. Road, Jogeshwari (W),
Mumbai- 400102.
Commissioner concerned Commissioner of Service Tax,Mumbai.
Present: for the Applicant None
 for the Commissioner  Shri A.K. Roy,
Joint CDR,
CESTAT, New Delhi.
Dates of Hearing 27.07.06 & 10.08.06

                                                          

ORDER

 

(Per Dr. Brahm Avtar Agrawal)

 

The crucial question for consideration in the instant case is as to whether the application made by Pfizer Limited for obtaining an advance ruling under sub-section (1) of section 96C of the Finance Act, 1994 ("Act") deserves admission or rejection. 

 

2.       The applicant, a joint venture Indian company, has stated the question, on which advance ruling is sought, as below: 

 

"Which clause in Section 65 to the Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 will be applicable to the supply of technical know-how, for the purposes of classification, since the same is not classifiable under clause (55a) for Intellectual Property Services?"

  

3.       The applicant has entered into agreements with its foreign collaborators for the supply of the technical know-how and assistance for use in the manufacture of certain pharmaceutical products the Indian company is engaged in. 

 

4.       The comments on the application were furnished by the Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai. 

 

5.       Before the question as to classification of service specified in the application could be adopted for examination leading to pronouncement of advance ruling thereon, it was felt necessary to call upon the applicant, and a notice was issued to it, to show cause as to how the application was maintainable, vide our Order dated 11.07.2006.  This Order was passed as on examination of the application and the comments of the Commissioner it prima facie appeared to us that:  

 

(i)      first proviso to sub-section (2) of section 96D of the Act was attracted; and

 

(ii)      clause (a) of section 96A of the Act was attracted as admittedly the activity was an on-going service. 

 

6.       Although two opportunities of personal hearing were extended to the applicant, it chose not to avail of any of them. However, the applicant in its letter dated 06.08.2006 replied to the two grounds as under:

 

"(i)    The case as mentioned in the letter dated March 27, 2006 of the Commissioner of Service Tax is for an earlier agreement and earlier period.  No case is pending for the agreement forming part of the advance ruling application.  Hence  it  is  submitted that there is no case pending before any Court/Tribunal pertaining to the present agreement.

 

  (ii)   The activity of supply of technical know how is an on-going activity."

 

7.       The first ground relates to the jurisdictional limitation of the Authority flowing from the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 96D of the Act, which reads as follows:

 

"The Authority may, after examining the application and the records called for, by order, either allow or reject the application:

 

          Provided that the Authority shall not allow the application where the question raised in the application is,-

 

(a)     already pending in the applicant's case before any Central Excise Officer, the Appellate Tribunal or any Court;

 

(b)     the same as in a matter already decided by the Appellate Tribunal or any Court:

 

          Provided further that no application shall be rejected under this sub-section unless an opportunity has been given to the applicant of being heard:

 

          Provided also that where the application is rejected, reasons for such rejection shall be given in the order." 

 

 

8.       A perusal of the provisions, extracted above, would show that under the first proviso to sub-section (2) of section 96D of the Act, the Authority cannot allow the application or, in other words, cannot entertain the application for pronouncing advance ruling on the question specified in the application under sub-section (4) thereof, if the question raised in the application is either already pending in the applicant's case before any Central Excise Officer or the Appellate Tribunal or any Court, or the question is the same as in a matter already decided by the Appellate Tribunal or any Court.  The Commissioner concerned  in  his letter dated 23.03.2006 has taken the stand that the question raised in the application is already pending in the applicant's case before the Bombay High Court as well as has already been decided by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), West Regional Bench At Mumbai, vide its Order No.A/332/WZB/2005-C-II dated 20.05.2005.  The said Order of the CESTAT is under appeal before the Bombay High Court. 

 

9.       A perusal of the papers in this connection, shows that the precise question before the Departmental Officers and the CESTAT was as to whether the Indian company received "consulting engineer's service" from outside India, that is, the service to a client in relation to advice, consultancy or technical assistance in any manner in one or more disciplines of engineering, which is a "taxable service".  It was held by the CESTAT that neither the foreign company nor the Indian company was a "consulting engineer".  Classification of the service in question as "intellectual property service" was neither in issue, nor considered by any of the authorities. The word "same" lexically means "identical", "not different" or "very similar", vide the Concise Oxford Dictionary and the Chambers 21st Century Dictionary.  The Black's Law Dictionary defines the word "same" as "the very thing just mentioned or described". In our view, the question raised in the application under consideration cannot be termed as the same as in a matter already decided; the question of the same being already pending in a Court does not arise.  Therefore, the first proviso to sub-section (2) of section 96D of the Act is not attracted, and the application cannot be disallowed on the basis of the first ground.

  

10.     The second ground concerns the definition of the expression "advance ruling" as given in clause (a) of section 96A of the Act, which reads thus:

          ' "advance ruling" means the determination, by the Authority, of a question of law or fact specified in the application regarding the liability to pay service tax in relation to a service proposed to be provided, by the applicant.'

 

 11.     A plain reading of the above definition makes it clear that "advance ruling" means the determination, by the Authority, of a question of law or fact specified in the application regarding the liability to pay service tax in relation to a service proposed to be provided by the applicant.  As the activity in question is admittedly an on-going service, no question seeking advance ruling thereon can be entertained by the Authority. For this reason, the application deserves rejection. 

  

12.     Accordingly, the application is rejected.                           

 

 

 

(Somnath Pal)        (Justice S.S.M. Quadri)            (Dr. B.A. Agrawal)

    Member                      Chairman                                Member

 

 

Pronounced in the open court on the 29th day of August, 2006.