News Flash
  • "Updated version of GST Concept and Status and PPT on GST - An Update"
  • Weekly newsletter from Chairman, CBEC dated 23/02/2018 Click here
  • Annual Calendar of Departmental Examination for the year 2018-19 Click here
  • 28th India - Sri Lanka DG Level Talks on Anti-Smuggling and related matters being held on 22-23 February, 2018 in New Delhi between DG, DRI and DG, Customs, Sri Lanka.
  • “All users are informed that, the new version of MSR for Part-I has been uploaded”
  • One day Training on Government e-Market Place (GeM) and Competition Law for Group 'A' officers of CBEC on 20th February, 2018 click here
  • Circular on Proper officer under sections 73 and 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and under the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 has been uploaded
  • Video on implementation of Swachhta Action Plan by CBEC Click here
  • Notification for postponing the implementation of e-way bill rules has been issued
  • Letter to All CCAs regarding Taking Care while send Direct Recruitment Quota Requisition to DGHRD Click here
  • Government e-Market Place (GeM) and Competition Law for Group 'A' officers of CBEC on 20th February, 2018 click here
  • Training Schedule of GeM & e-Procurement Click Here
  • FAQs on EWay Bill Provisions in GSTclick here
  • CBEC launches IT tools ICETRAK and ICETAB for trade facilitation and faster clearances – To download ICETRAK, click here here on your Android mobile phone
  • Complete utilization of funds under "O.E." & "RRT" Object Heads in FY 2017-18click here
  • Letter to all CCs/DGs informing DGHRD Swachhta Whatapp Numberclick here
  • Reports on user Experienceclick here
  • Removing "Retired, but PPO not issued" figures reflecting on "Bhavishya" portal screenclick here
  • Advisory on AIO functioning, connectivity issues for GST.-click here, TCS Escalatoin Matrix for GST Zones LAN Implementation, Wipro Handholders, HP Resident Engineers
View all

F.No.390/Misc./163/2010-JC

Ministry of Finance

Department of Revenue

Central Board of Excise & Customs

*****

New Delhi 17th  August 2011

INSTRUCTION

To,

 

  1. All Chief Commissioners and Directors General under the Central Board of Excise and Customs.
  2. CDR, Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.
  3. All Commissioners of Customs/Central Excise/Service Tax/All Joint Chief Departmental Representatives/Commissioner, Directorate of Legal Affairs.
  4. <webmaster.cbec@icegate.gov.in>

Sub:-                Reduction of Government litigation - providing monetary limits for filing appeals by the Department before CESTAT/High Courts and Supreme court - Regarding

In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 35R of the Central Excise Act, 1944 made applicable to Service Tax vide Section 83 of the Finance Act,1994 and Section 131BA of the Customs Act, 1962 the Central Board of Excise & Customs (hereinafter referred to as the Board) fixes the following monetary limits below which appeal shall not be filed in the Tribunal, High Court and the Supreme Court:

 

Sl.No.Appellate ForumMonetary limit
1.CESTATRs.5,00,000/-
2.HIGH COURTSRs.10,00,000/-
3.SUPREME COURTRs.25,00,000/-

 

  1. 2.         For ascertaining whether a matter would be covered within or without the aforementioned limits, the determinative element would be duty/tax under dispute.  To illustrate it further in a case involving duty of Rs. 5 lakhs or below with equal penalty and interest, as the case may be, no appeal shall be filed in the Tribunal.  Similarly, no appeal shall be filed in the HighCourts if the duty involved does not exceed Rs.10 lakhs with or without penalty and interest.  Further, the Commissionerates shall not send proposal to the Board for filing Civil Appeal or Special Leave Petition in the Supreme Court in a case involving duty up to Rs.25 lakhs, whether with penalty and interest or otherwise.    However, where the imposition of penalty is the subject matter of dispute and the said penalty exceeds the limit prescribed, then the matter could be litigated further.  Similarly, where the subject matter of dispute is the demand of interest and the amount of interest exceeds the prescribed limit, then the matter may require further litigation.

 

  1. 3.         Adverse judgments relating to the following should be contested irrespective of the amount involved:
    1. a)         Where the constitutional validity of the provisions of an Act or Rule is under challenge.
    2. b)         Where Notification/ Instruction/ Order or Circular has been held illegal or ultra vires

 

  1. 4.         Several queries connected with application of monetary limits have been raised by the field formations which were considered by the Board and are being clarified as below:-

 

IssuesClarifications
  1. Whether duty involved mentioned in the Instruction dated 20.10.2010 refers to duty outstanding to be collected or the total duty demanded for deciding the threshold limit prescribed therein.
In a case where a part of the duty demanded is not disputed and is paid and the outstanding duty under dispute is less than the monetary limit prescribed by the Board, no appeal shall be filed. In other words, monetary limit shall apply on the disputed duty and not on the total duty demanded in a case.
  1. Whether monetary limits would apply to cases of refund.
 It is clarified that the monetary limits being prescribed by the Board would apply to cases of refund as well.
 
  1. Whether applications being filed by the Department before office of Joint Secretary (Revision Application) would also be covered under the stipulation of monetary limits.
The limit specified herein will not be applicable to application filed before the Joint Secretary (Revision Application).
 
  1. Whether exclusion of audit objections mentioned in para 6(c) of Instruction dated 20.10.2010 would cover internal audit objection cases also or whether they would be limited to cases of revenue audit alone.
The intention was to apply the exclusion clause mentioned at para 6(c) only to disputes arising out of revenue audit objections accepted by the Department.  It has now been decided to delete the said exclusion clause (refer para 3 of this Instruction). Therefore, in all cases of audit objections accepted by the Department, while protective demands may continue to be issued but the same would be subjected to the monetary limits for filing appeal in the Tribunal, High Courts and the Supreme Court.

 

  1. 5.         The revised monetary limits shall come into force from 1.9.2011. 

 

  1. 6.         This Instruction is in continuation of earlier Instruction of even number dated 20.10.2010 and seeks to revise the monetary limits, exclusion clauses and clarifies the doubts raised by the field formations on this issue.

 

 

 

            (Sunil K. Sinha )

Director (R)

26162156