News Flash
  • CGST Rules, 2017 as amended upto 18/10/2017 have been uploaded.click here
  • Circular clarifying movement of goods on approval basis has been issued
  • Circular on Authorized officer for enrolment of Goods and Services Tax Practitioner has been issued
  • 3 CGST Notifications related to export package issued
  • Circular clarifying movement of goods on approval basis has been issued.click here
  • Circular on Authorized officer for enrollment of Goods and Services Tax Practitioner has been issued.click here
  • Notification 26/2017-Central Excise (NT) dated 17-10-2017 and circular 208/6/2017-Service Tax dated 17.10.2017 have been issued regarding redistribution of cases pending with Commissioner (Appeals) on 30-6-2017.click here
  • Results for THE DEPARTMENTAL EXAM FOR PROMOTION OF MINISTERIAL OFFICERS TO THE POST OF EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT (STA) / INSPECTORS OF CENTRAL EXCISE / INSPECTORS OF CUSTOMS (EOs & POs) held in the month of August 2017, have been declared and sent to the respective CC Zones & Commissionerates.
  • List of ports and ICDs wherein e-seal readers are to be provided by the vendors-.click here
  • New Notifications issued under CGST Act, 2017, IGST Act, 2017 and UTGST Act, 2017.click here
  • The Customs heritage Half Marathon to be held at Mumbai on 29.10.2017.The last date for registration is 22.10.2017.click here
  • Upkeep & Safety of equipment-UPS provided by CBEC.click here
  • No extension of last date for filing GSTR-1 for July, 2017.click here
  • Defence against Writ Petitions/PILs relating to GST-regclick here
  • Press realease on 22nd GST Council Meeting dated 06.10.2017.click here
  • GST rates approved by GST council on 06/10/2017.click here
  • Press note export packages.click here
  • Press note on decisions taken by GST council in 22nd meeting on 06/10/2017.click here
  • All CCs/DGs are requested to check online the "PPT on best practices on Swachhta"by the formations under CBEC.click here
  • Circular on Bond/Letter of Undertaking for exports issued.click here
  • Notification on extension of facility of LUT to all exporters issued.click here
  • Details of Vendors providing E-seals to exportersclick here
  • Eighth amendment to CGST Rules, 2017click here
  • Extension of time limit for intimation of details in FORM GST CMP-03click here
  • Incase of any LAN-WAN issues please call 18002662232/18001214560 or mail Saksham.Seva@icegate.gov.in
View all

Circular No. 674/65/2002-CX
1st Nov., 2002

F.No. 210 /01/2002-CX-6
Government of India
Ministry of Finance & Company Affairs
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Excise & Customs

Subject: - Raising of protective demands consequent to CERA objection- modification of circular 5/83-CX6 dated 10.3.83- reg.

            I am directed to draw your attention to Board's circular No. 5/83-CX6 dated 10.3.83 issued from F.No. 210/28/81-CX6 and circular No. 444/10/99-CX dated 12.3.99 issued from F.No.210/1/99-CX6 wherein it has been, inter alia, directed that immediately on receipt of objection from CERA , demand-cum-show cause notice should be issued without any loss of time even if the Central Excise officers do not agree with Audit's point of view. Later the instructions were modified to say that protective demands may not be raised pursuant to CERA objections which are contrary to orders issued by Board under section 37 B of Central Excise Act, 1944.

2.         The matter has been re examined by the Board. It is observed that the field formations continue to issue protective demands on the basis of the objections raised by CERA which are contrary to Board's circulars/ instructions (not issued under section 37 B). Since the settlement of audit objection takes time, the protective demands go on piling up. In this regard, it is the consistent view of the Apex Court [Collector of Central Excise, Patna vs Usha Martin Industries] {1997(94)ELT 460(SC)} that the instructions/ circulars issued by Board or Ministry are binding on the field formations. These instructions/ circulars too have legal backing as these are part of the technical functions which are performed under the statute by Board. Therefore, the raising of protective demands contrary to Board's circulars/ instructions shows inherent inconsistency. The Apex Court has also held in the case of Ranadey Micronutrients vs Collector of Central Excise that ".....Consistency and discipline are of far greater importance than the winning or losing of Court proceedings."[1996(87) ELT19(SC)] . In view of above it has become imperative to modify earlier instructions on the subject.

3.         Accordingly, it has been decided that wherever Board's instructions or circulars (whether issued under section 37 B or not) exist on a particular issue, no protective demands should be raised on the basis of CERA objection if the objection is contrary to such Board's instructions or circulars. However, in all such cases, the matter should be immediately referred to PAC section of the Board for resolving the issue with the C&AG of India.

4.        Field formations may please be informed suitably.

5.        Receipt of the same may be acknowledged.

6.        Hindi version will follow.